Martin mate...this has nothing to do with wanting to slag off pro rodgers people. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and it's good that they have one. Pro Rodgers are allowed as are Con Rodgers.
The Con's would probably love to be wrong about Rodgers and that we're seeing a dramatic change in our fortunes. BUT WE'RE NOT.
As I said in my post, or at least tried to, it's not about having different views on things, it's about, at least for me, intentions, attitude and willingness to see things in a levelheaded manner.
Just pointing out some of Rodgers ludicrous mistakes has not been confirmed as breaking the blasphemy codes.
But it isn't just pointing out his mistakes, it's about see and moan about them wherever they can or cannot be found. After we beat Swansea all you could hear was contempt for us having the nerve to beat a side where some players were rested as if they were in fact Messi, Ronaldo, Van Persie etc. Me? I was glad as fork we bounced back and gave us the perfect set up for tonite's game. But that's probably just me, Ray and Edward.
The latest state of let's face it GIBBERISH from Rodgers which Ted pointed out only digs him deeper into his hole.
Could, shoulda, woulda..
It's funny really. When it suits your argument media's a huge lot that conspire against you. When it suits your argument, they represent the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So what if he's a bit of a talker. Is it really really really that troublesome? I may not prefer it myself but to ridicule and p**s on the manager because of his personal qualities is just shameful the way I see it.
If he had kept seasoned pro's like Bellers, maxi and kuyt, aquilani and carroll...then he would have been stronger.. No shine-a-light..Is he blaming himself?
Trying to change things to quickly, rather than ease the team into a new system? Most clever managers would, to try to change over night showed in the poor results.
Bart mate, no pun intended, but you know fack all about who called those shots and to what extent. None, zip, zero, furkin nil. So until you have first hand information on what happend, who, where and because of what it just goes a long way to prove I'm right in saying some people on here truly have an agenda that is shockingly illoyal. I won't comment on the pro's and con's of keeping/getting rid of those players as that's an entirely different, albeit very interesting, discussion.
i'm hoping obviously that we win tonight. Do i trust Rodgers to pick the right team? Nope, not me.
Pointing out what the manager does and says is not being negative. It's simply a case of pointing out that maybe the ship shouldnt be steering into a large iceberg.
But shouldn't ther be, then, at least some sort of evidence we're heading straight on to that iceberg? Some? Just little? How little? By the sound of you and others we were heading for that iceberg before the ship was even manufactured, ffs.
Finally, pointing out what the manager does and says is hardly a neutral pastime, now is it? You do it for a reason. Then, why is everything he said always and without exception quoted in a negative context? Is it because every single word he uttered since June 1 2012 was that wrong, bad, flawed? Every word? Every time? You lot carry no credibility to yor constant complaining. It's tedious and embarrassing at best.